Orthodoxy

Orthodoxy

G.K. Chesterton / Oct 14, 2019

Orthodoxy Chesterton The Man Who Knew Too Much capped his brilliant literary career with this exploration of right thinking and how it led to his acceptance of the Christian faith Although this is a very perso

  • Title: Orthodoxy
  • Author: G.K. Chesterton
  • ISBN: null
  • Page: 473
  • Format: Hardcover
  • Chesterton The Man Who Knew Too Much capped his brilliant literary career with this exploration of right thinking, and how it led to his acceptance of the Christian faith Although this is a very personal account of his conversion, Chesterton makes it clear he came to a rational decision based upon his scholarly examination of Christianity s arguments, intending to proChesterton The Man Who Knew Too Much capped his brilliant literary career with this exploration of right thinking, and how it led to his acceptance of the Christian faith Although this is a very personal account of his conversion, Chesterton makes it clear he came to a rational decision based upon his scholarly examination of Christianity s arguments, intending to provide a positive companion to the previous Heretics This is a reprint of the edition published by Dodd, Mead Company, and cited in Books for College Libraries, 3d ed Annotation 2004 Book News, Inc Portland, OR

    Orthodoxy Orthodoxy from Greek orthodoxa right opinion is adherence to correct or accepted creeds, especially in religion In the Christian sense the term means conforming to the Christian faith as represented in the creeds of the early Church The first seven ecumenical councils were held between the years of and with the aim of formalizing accepted doctrines. Orthodoxy G K Chesterton, Gilbert Keith Chesterton Orthodoxy is a book by G K Chesterton that has become a classic of Christian apologetics Chesterton considered this book a companion to his other work, Heretics. Orthodoxy G K Chesterton Books Orthodoxy is the book by G K Chesterton that has become a classic of Christian apologetics Chesterton considered it a companion to his other work, Heretics In the book s preface Chesterton states the purpose is to attempt an explanation, not of whether the Christian faith can be believed, but of how he personally has come to believe it. Eastern Orthodox Church The Eastern Orthodox Church, officially the Orthodox Catholic Church, is the second largest Christian church, with approximately million members As one of the oldest religious institutions in the world, the Eastern Orthodox Church has played a prominent role in the history and culture of Eastern and Southeastern Europe, the Caucasus, and the Near East. Orthodox Definition of Orthodox by Merriam Webster Did You Know An orthodox religious belief or interpretation is one handed down by a church s founders or leaders When capitalized, as in Orthodox Judaism, Orthodox refers to a branch within a larger religious organization that claims to honor the religion s original or traditional beliefs The steadfast holding of established beliefs that is seen in religious orthodoxy is apparent also in OrthodoxyToday Home The signs of unhealthy dependence are high intensity of the emotional need, a sense of self worthlessness, a lack of confidence and ensuing helplessness and hopelessness when not dependent on TrueOrthodoxy.Info Welcome True Orthodox Information Welcome May God s blessing be upon you I should like to welcome one and all to TrueOrthodoxy.Info , the new treasure house containing the precious pearls of EU Orthodoxy is the Enemy Monomakhos Source Agora Dialogue REX Carl Bildt thinks Eastern Orthodoxy is main threat to western civilisation Stockholm Carl Bildt, Sweden s Minister for Foreign Affairs and one of the architects of the EU Eastern policy, thinks Russia has changed for the worse in the past several years. Orthodoxy and Monarchy Monomakhos Symphonia was a creation of the Church Fathers, and explication of the Gospel Vladimir Moss has an excellent, very well researched article on Orthodoxy and the Monarchy. Glossary of Church Terms The Victorious Christian Network Frequently asked questions about the church often include the many cliches, theological terms, and vernacular used by ministers and laymen.

    • Unlimited [Thriller Book] ¾ Orthodoxy - by G.K. Chesterton ò
      473 G.K. Chesterton
    • thumbnail Title: Unlimited [Thriller Book] ¾ Orthodoxy - by G.K. Chesterton ò
      Posted by:G.K. Chesterton
      Published :2018-011-18T18:45:12+00:00

    About "G.K. Chesterton"

      • G.K. Chesterton

        Gilbert Keith Chesterton 1874 1936 was born in London, educated at St Paul s, and went to art school at University College London In 1900, he was asked to contribute a few magazine articles on art criticism, and went on to become one of the most prolific writers of all time He wrote a hundred books, contributions to 200 , hundreds of poems, including the epic Ballad of the White Horse, five plays, five novels, and some two hundred short stories, including a popular series featuring the priest detective, Father Brown In spite of his literary accomplishments, he considered himself primarily a journalist He wrote over 4000 newspaper essays, including 30 years worth of weekly columns for the Illustrated London News, and 13 years of weekly columns for the Daily News He also edited his own newspaper, G.K s Weekly.Chesterton was equally at ease with literary and social criticism, history, politics, economics, philosophy, and theology.


    387 Comments

    1. I bought it because I heard this quote recently"A child kicks its legs rhythmically through excess, not absence, of life. Because children have abounding vitality, because they are in spirit fierce and free, therefore they want things repeated and unchanged. They always say, "Do it again"; and the grown-up person does it again until he is nearly dead. For grown-up people are not strong enough to exult in monotony. But perhaps God is strong enough It is possible that God says every morning, "Do i [...]


    2. I have to think of Chesterton as happy nitroglycerin. This book sends your head up into the clouds while driving your feet deep into the earth. It spins you dizzier than you've ever been, yet makes you walk straighter than you've ever walked. Read this first in 2007, again in 2011.


    3. It is with extreme reluctance that I condemn this work as worthless. The person who recommended it to me is one whose opinion and learning I respect greatly.Chesterton seems to think (although I'm not entirely sure of anything in this book, inasmuch as the author refuses to write in anything but figurative language and metaphor. In fact, the term "mixed metaphor" is an entirely inappropriate descriptor. One would need to use exponents to keep track of the metaphors and smilies that he heaps upon [...]


    4. This is an absolute must for either Catholics or Protestants, as Chesterton addresses an aspect of mere Christianity (it's profound and monumental common sensensicalness!) in a way that sparkles with wit, humor, and intellectual derring-do.Incidentally, if you set yourself to reading it out loud, you will put yourself through a training in diction and oral expression that far surpasses anything you could ever hire.


    5. imagine walking into a dangerous and violent bar with the biggest, baddest ufc champion ever to grace the octagon. or walking into a house party with the hottest date ever. or entering a church basketball tournament with an nba caliber ringer on your team. i'm guessing that's what it would have felt like to walk with gk chesterton into a room full of skeptics and post-modern christian haters. okay, that whole paragraph did not work. but this book deserves credit for being mostly a pre-modern wor [...]


    6. "And though St John the Evangelist saw many strange monsters in his vision, he saw no creature so wild as one of his own commentators" "It was natural, perhaps, that a modern Marxian Socialist should not know anything about free will""The new scientific society definitely discourages men from thinking about death""Mr. McCabe thinks me a slave because I am not allowed to believe in determinism" "But the Greeks were right when they made Apollo the god both of imagination and of sanity, for he was [...]



    7. A complex work of great scope that I will need to read a few more times. Chesterton uses metaphors to explain the meaning of his theses, and the reader must work to comprehend what they signify on different levels. I find it amazing that this was first published in 1908. Its ideas refer to - but are so independent from - the philosophies of that time, as though it were written today looking back on them rather than their contemporary.I'll not write a comprehensive review, but just wish to list s [...]


    8. I learned that the Orthodoxy of the Catholic faith is what keeps it (and the world) sane. It calls to us from our fairy tales while at the same time appealing to our logic.I also learned why so many people, like C.S. Lewis, Scott Hahn, and J.R.R. Tolkien have made reference to G.K. Chesterton - he is brilliant. His mastery of the English language is second to none.The only difficulty of this book is that it may come off as "high-brow" because it was written in the U.K. (and their English is diff [...]


    9. I first read this in 1975. It was a life-saver then. Not sure how many times I have read it since, but Nancy and I just finished reading it aloud together (May 2013). Fantastic, as always.


    10. "Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true."Certainly nothing is irrelevant to discussing Christianity when G.K. Chesterton writes a classic apologetics work. Orthodoxy is and is not a typical apologetics work. It defends the orthodox Christian world-view and it moreover discusses and reveals what Chesterton's own views and values were. As such Chesterton does not back away from discussing as [...]


    11. Chesterton was one of the premier Christian thinkers of his generation, fully engaged in the intellectual debates of his day (which turn out to be not much different from those of our own!). His writing is frequently characterized by love of paradox, exuberant humor, and intellectual rigor which can make his thought demanding to follow in places (a quality mitigated by his clear effort to tailor the presentation to the average educated reader). All of those qualities are in evidence here. It's a [...]


    12. When I first started reading this book, I was dumbfounded, and I quickly sensed my vulnerability. I’m used to reading challenging authors who work hard to drop-kick your old paradigms and hold you teeth-down to the grinding concrete they’re speeding recklessly over in pursuit of truth. I can sense when an author is sliding towards sensationalism and theatrics in his attempt to convince readers that their life is a sham and essentially a waste of time. I even like it when authors do that, bec [...]


    13. Chesterton is witty but dense; his reasoning requires concentration. If I am reading him and not paying close attention to the trajectory of his thought, I find myself saying, "What is he babbling about? What does this have to do with anything, let alone Christian orthodoxy?" If I am paying attention, however, I often find him extremely insightful, and I wish to highlight nearly ever line. I also find him quite contemporary; what he says seems to apply somehow to every age. This is not apologeti [...]


    14. This was my umpteenth time reading Orthodoxy. For years I had the audio version on my iPod Shuffle. Hilariously it played the chapters out of order, but it didn't really matter. I listened to them over and over again. it was fun to go back and read it in print again. And as other of my friends have said, even though I am one of the dreadful Calvinists, I still love Chesterton and his masterful way with words. Since I read it on my Kindle I will share my highlights that way. I am looking forward [...]


    15. The title belies the true depth and value of this book. Chesterton writes, ostensibly, to share his own conclusions about why Christianity is true and worth following. But the book is so much bigger than that, just as it is so much more intimate than a mere treatise on orthodoxy. Chesterton offers clarity of thought and imagination and wit. Every single page offers something interesting and new to chew on. I’ll be returning to this one over and over.


    16. 3.5 stars.This would have been 5 stars, except it went way over my head in the last 3 chapters or so. The first three-fourths of the book were absolutely brilliant and insightful and, with a little extra time taken to ponder, fairly easily taken in and understood, which I can appreciate, being a silly and easily befuddled young'un.You ever read something and you think, "Man, that's deep. I know this is genius, but I can't quite wrap my head around it", and then your brain starts to hurt, but you [...]


    17. Controversial, but brilliant. Striking, but baffling. Quotable, but confusing.I almost gave this five stars -- the content is certainly profound and incredible at some points -- but the methods in which Chesterton tackles his ideas are too tangled up and confusing. He makes large leaps in his logic, leaving the reader no room to catch up before going on. While Chesterton repeatedly describes his ideas through pictures, often these explanations still aren't sufficient -- he fails to remember that [...]


    18. Available online.My first Chesterton book. It was slow-going for the first few chapters, but I enjoyed it more as I went on. This book has come up again and again, and I really need to read through it again. Having interacted with it on a deeper level since the first time I read it, I think that I'd give it five stars if I read it again.Here's Piper on why Chesterton's anti-Calvinism isn't completely off-putting. Here's N. D. Wilson on Chestertonian Calvinism.


    19. One of the three most influential books in my life outside the Bible. This book would have made me Catholic, if I wasn't already. It also kept me a Catholic, as I was on my way out of the Church before I read it. It confirmed me in my Catholic faith, made the Church make sense for the first time, and set me on the way I'm still traveling. It gave me a vision for where I was and where I was going. I'm still on my way.


    20. This is the third time I have read Orthodoxy by G.K. Chesterton, and I hope it will not be the last. Written near the beginning of his career, it is by far his best book on the subject of religion. Although he was to return a number of times to the same well, the water was fresher in 1908, some fourteen years before he made his decision to convert to Catholicism. Afterwards, there was an institutional tinge to his writing that vitiated many of his later efforts.As a lapsed Catholic, I was surpri [...]


    21. Reviewing G.K. Chesterton's Orthodoxy is a daunting task, given the purpose of the book, his sophisticated and subtle commentary, and the nature of the subject. Nevertheless, I'll try to write a response that will enable potential readers to determine what Chesterton wrote about, why, and how successfully.Already I find myself laboring to pull salient points and summarize arguments from Chesterton's book. The main thing to understand is that this book isn't an apologia for Christianity; I believ [...]


    22. I LOVED Orthodoxy. I feel like I barely skimmed the depths of it. I am definitely going to re-read this one many times. Chesterton is utterly brilliant and reading him is like thinking on a different level. It took me a while to get through this book because I felt like I needed to take it slowly. I don't know where to begin with this book, primarily because I feel like I have only just begun. I feel like I have been stretched on my thoughts about stories, worldview, and the role of joy in the C [...]


    23. Oh, Gilbert, you do delight me so. I can't help it a good Calvinist I must admit that I was predestined to love you despite your bigotry against my kind. Oh, Mr. Carter, I wonder if you ever laugh. And I wonder how you made it through this reading without ever seeming to crack a smile. (I notice that LibriVox has a second edition. I will download that for my next "reading.")


    24. This was a pretty straightforward book. It read like a justification essay, and it had some clear thoughts about the subject. On the negative side, it was kind of boring, but that does not mean it was bad!Until the next book,Leah Jay (Reading Cavy)


    25. Brillante, lúcido. Escrito hace cien años, y narra los errores de hoy. El capítulo VIII es profético. Pero sigo poniendo por encima El hombre eterno.


    26. this review first appeared on [intraspace]i've finally finished reading his book 'orthodoxy'. it looks little, like a quick read, and then it isn'tis book seems to have had a revival in the last couple of years. it's recommended by philip yancey, john eldridge mentions it a lot in his writings, and relevant media (purveyors of christian cool) have just released a version under their imprint. i suppose it was also considered a 'christian classic' before this recent press - i've heard that it was [...]


    27. G.K. Chesterton is a rhetorical master, and nowhere is his virtuosity on better display than in Orthodoxy. This book is saturated with classical rhetorical devices, so it may be a bit heavy-handed for modernists. If you enjoy a clever turn of phrase and a top-notch wit, Chesterton is hard to beat.Orthodoxy is noteworthy for its substantive content as well. In this book, G.K. defends Christianity against the amoral relativism of his day (the turn of the 20th Century). His primary foil is George B [...]


    28. Chesterton is so quintessentially quotable that I thought it would be fun to try filling a commonplace book of nothing but Chesterton quotes. But then I gradually realized that this work is a commonplace book of nothing but Chesterton quotes so that making my own would simply be redundant. Orthodoxy is filled with one brilliant moment after another, but the book as a whole seemed a bit haphazard, like it might have a hard time passing a sobriety test. But maybe that's the point: the wild and unp [...]


    29. He says some of the main things without exploring them further. If he did explore those ideas it would have to go in a different book. Sometimes after saying something deep he retreats and says something more straightforward, and he can be funny at times, Chesterton's being the person whom he describes in the beginning of the book(kinda). I would say it is a good book for understanding the 'summary' of some of the main problems in Atheism and Agnosticism and the critiques of Christianity.


    Leave a Reply