The Population Bomb

The Population Bomb

Paul R. Ehrlich / Sep 16, 2019

The Population Bomb Book annotation not available for this title Title The Population BombAuthor Ehrlich Paul R Publisher Buccaneer BooksPublication Date Number of Pages Binding Type HARDCOVERLibrary of Congr

  • Title: The Population Bomb
  • Author: Paul R. Ehrlich
  • ISBN: 9781568495873
  • Page: 208
  • Format: Hardcover
  • Book annotation not available for this title.Title The Population BombAuthor Ehrlich, Paul R.Publisher Buccaneer BooksPublication Date 19951201Number of Pages 201Binding Type HARDCOVERLibrary of Congress BL 99003979

    The Population Bomb Paul R Any list of influential texts on the environment and environmental activism will include The Population Bomb It also is a period piece that gives insight to the time period it was written People are still moved by Erlich s premise and are compelled to comment even years after the book was published. The Population Bomb by Paul R Ehrlich The Population Bomb, as its title suggests and as the tone of writing reflects, is a warning of impending crisis It was one of the first books to discuss the inherent conflict between growing human demands and finite resources The most pressing concern at the time was food security. The Population Bomb definition of The Population Bomb by In The Population Bomb and other works, he argued that government should adopt policies to achieve the optimum sustainable population size, which he approximated at about percent to percent of the earth s population circa . The population bomb Book, WorldCat Note Citations are based on reference standards However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied. The population bomb Paul R Ehrlich An expert in population biology, ecology, evolution, and behavior, Ehrlich has published than articles and scientific papers He is perhaps best known for his environmental classic The Population Bomb Paul Ehrlich and his wife Anne began working together shortly after their marriage in . The population bomb ScienceDirect Main Text The biologist Paul Ehrlich came to public attention in with the publication of his book, The Population Bomb Worries about the potential problems of a soaring global population had boiled and cooled over previous decades.

    • Best Read [Paul R. Ehrlich] ↠ The Population Bomb || [Paranormal Book] PDF ✓
      208 Paul R. Ehrlich
    • thumbnail Title: Best Read [Paul R. Ehrlich] ↠ The Population Bomb || [Paranormal Book] PDF ✓
      Posted by:Paul R. Ehrlich
      Published :2018-011-16T13:22:35+00:00

    About "Paul R. Ehrlich"

      • Paul R. Ehrlich

        Paul Ralph Ehrlich is an American biologist and educator who is the Bing Professor of Population Studies in the department of Biological Sciences at Stanford University and president of Stanford s Center for Conservation Biology By training he is an entomologist specializing in Lepidoptera butterflies , but he is better known as an ecologist and a demographer, specifically for his warnings about unchecked population growth and limited resources Ehrlich became a household name after publication of his controversial 1968 book The Population Bomb.


    327 Comments

    1. 45 years ago, and the exponential growth of world population has continued. 3.5 billion peeps in 1968 and it has more than doubled since then. Agricultural methods that rely on toxic chemicals, fertilizers, and genetic modification of seed stock, all dependent on petroleum that has surpassed its peak production and, if you talk about sustainability, half of the population in the USA will look at you like you are crazy. When I read this as a junior in high school in 1969, I thought that the Chine [...]


    2. In 1968, biologist Paul Ehrlich achieved infamy by publishing The Population Bomb, one of the most controversial eco-books ever printed. Ehrlich has been condemned to spend eternity with Thomas Malthus, in a dungeon reserved for doom perverts. To this day, professors still use the two lads as great reasons to never take seriously anyone who asserts that there are limits to growth. We all know, of course, that humankind has no limits. We have technology!Actually, Malthus never predicted catastrop [...]


    3. A scary and honest book, written in the seventies, but even more true today than the time it was written. Ehrlich's book reminds you that that cute, puff-cheeked lil sweetie screaming and gurgling away in the corner, that gets you all those government benefits, is actually contributing to the dangerous overcrowding that threatens to destroy our world. True, some of Ehrlich's predictions were exaggerated, and he failed to take into account some of the mitigating factors, but his basic argument - [...]


    4. One of Cambridge Sustainability's Top 50 Books for Sustainability, as voted for by our alumni network of over 3,000 senior leaders from around the world. To find out more, click here.The Population Bomb, as its title suggests and as the tone of writing reflects, is a warning of impending crisis. It was one of the first books to discuss the inherent conflict between growing human demands and finite resources. The most pressing concern at the time was food security. Given population and agricultur [...]



    5. Well the worst of his predictions failed to come true. Though the ideas were valid ones, the jury is still out on whether or not he was right in raising the alarm, time will tell


    6. Like many of my generation, I grew up expecting nuclear war or accident, to which fears were added those of civil collapse and environmental destruction during high school. Unlike some, I sought out information about these eventualities rather than trying not to think about them and became politically active early on as a quixotic gesture in defiance of what appeared increasingly inevitable. In this context, my dad's copy of Ehrlich's Population Bomb was just more grist for the mill, a little li [...]


    7. Some things should be required in order to graduate high school and being allowed to procreate. A course in LOGIC, even if it's just pass/fail, and reading this or a similar book. Humans are delusional and refuse to accept the earth and it's resources are finite. We need a serious wake up call, as there are ALREADY too many people on this planet, as the extinction of other species has proven. We are now a cancer on the planet.


    8. The voice of a prophet crying in the wilderness. Half a century later, people are still sleepwalking in denial. The elephant is still in the parlor and still no one wants to see it, or talk about it! This was a very important book. You can argue with his timeline, but the fact is that the earth has added a billion people in the last twelve years! That will have consequences, and they will not be pretty!


    9. I read in college in the 70's. I was very impressionable. I have learned to be much more skeptical. Not recommend other than if you seek alarmist propaganda.


    10. I gather the Population Bomb was quite a sensation when it came out in the late 1960s, and suggesting that mass worldwide starvation was inevitable in the coming decade or so. Obviously, the doom and gloom it predicted never came to pass, and it's not even in print any longer. It's cultural moment seems to have passed. It's an interesting read, but not for the reasons Ehrlich originally intended.The tone of the book isrident, I guess is the word I want. Ehrlich believed that the upper bounds of [...]


    11. i finally got around to reading paul ehrlich's pivotal book on population and i'm glad i read it. more than expected, it's a little more doom and gloom, but i think that's my perception mostly based around his predictions for the state of the world by 1970 and the apocalyptic ink drawings. they are so simple, but stark and depressing.overall, i agree that his message is spot on and the highlights from the book include some of his proposed solutions. some of them are simple and others innovative. [...]


    12. Incredibly alarmist, makes lots of sweeping statements not backed up by analysis or evidence, and given the benefit of hindsight, incredibly wrong in his predictions. Even so, many of his more moderate prescriptions are good ideas in any event, especially about changing attitudes around reproduction and the growth rate. In a way, it's a study in how not to be taken seriously in a policy debate, and a warning about how wrong even scientific "experts" can be.


    13. Aged poorly, a lot of the predictions Paul made haven't come true so I find myself doubting a lot of what he says. Occasionally he makes good points, but the book comes off as alarmist more then anything else.


    14. I recommend this book very highly even though I am actually quite critical of it. It is by a biologist with no acknowledgements in what, in some parts, are clearly international-relations analyses. Furthermore, as a mathematician-turned-political scientist, I find the methodology highly suspect. There is no recognition of the fact that food problems are largely problems of distribution; for a social science text it is void of any cogent analysis of social and political or cultural factors; it ta [...]


    15. I think this guy was a little premature with some of his predictions but overall I agree that the world needs to be depopulated if you want avoid turning it into a total living hell for all who dwell here. The problem is the only group of people who they have been able to convince to stop having so many kids are white people, who are also the only people that at least a segment of care one way or another about the environment. I know a lot of people read the stuff from the Club of Rome, think th [...]


    16. I read “The Population Bomb” when it was originally published. At the time I was a student of the agricultural sciences, and felt that Erlich had omitted and/or ignored many of the principles of food production. Still I felt that there were some credibility to his words. With an alarmist tone, Erlich foresaw a desperate future with mass starvation for millions or more by the next thirty years. He proposed solutions such as government imposed population control with the United States leading [...]


    17. Holy crap, I just read about the end of the world that is coming by 1977 and I'm still here in 2014.The book, while obviously shown to be wrong, is still worth a read today as it is a classic study in alarmist propaganda.Nothing we can do, too late, still must try. Have to act now for the children. No time for more studies, the science is in. I could be wrong, but what if I'm right? We have to act anyways.Those are all phrases you will think about and read in this book.Even the scenarios, if we [...]


    18. How fortunate Ehrlich's predictions, and fears, turned out to be wrong. This is not a jab--social scientists (myself included) are famously lousy at prophecy. Does the neo-Malthusian thread still have a dog in the ecological-political crisis fight? I am still agnostic on this question, while also disturbed by the degree to which this question has been politicized, particularly by some dependency and feminist globalization theorists, who accuse those who even raise this question of patriarchal or [...]


    19. Read this my last year of high school and ever since couldn't understand why anyone would be against any kind of birth control, including abortion, given the population constraints of our planet.


    20. This is the book that all of the 'thinking' people were reading in the 70s. Most of us at that time limited our families to two children to save the plant , we were all spirits of the world trying to help Mother Earth become a better home for us all. we'd had "Ban the Bomb" and the Aldermaston marches, most of us became blood donors, and make Love not War, be happy, help each other, was the order of the day.How things change, We now have people proudly telling us that their 17th child is about t [...]


    21. I heard Paul Ehrlich on the Diane Rehm show recently, which really sparked my thinking about overpopulation as contributing to climate change, as well as a whole myriad of other factors. I'm really interested in this book as an artifact of its time, and also as how it did/didn't accurately predict the state we're in todayA: I made it about 50-60 pages in before I got scared and discouraged and had to put it down. Ehrlich and his wife have a new book out - I think I'll look for that one instead.


    22. Many of his suggestions are problematic, if not downright morally offensive, and his doomsday scenario has (at least in some instances) been avoided, but his premise remains sound. We have been irresponsible trustees of the earth and it will ultimately lead to the destruction of our species. While his speculations about the future are faulty, his look to the past sheds enormous light on the underlying causes behind our reckless approach to conservation.


    23. It was written decades ago, so of course much of it is outdated and some of Ehrlich's predictions didn't come true. However, the overall message of the dangers of overpopulation is still relevant. You come away from the book knowing that there are no easy answers, but that there are at least SOME answers. Also, for those concerned, Ehrlich addresses the issues of eugenics that inevitably pop up during a discussion of overpopulation.


    24. Given the controversy, wanted to read it for myself. Its strength and its flaw is that it still feels timely today (that's a flaw because it came out almost 50 years ago, and was fairly apocalyptic). He's unsettlingly comfortable with coercion and I think misses the importance of food maldistribution in creating hunger, but I was pleasantly surprised by some of his points about US foreign policy and overconsumption. Mixed feelings overall, but it's quite readable.


    25. Certainly alarmist, history has shown his near future predictions were vastly over estimated but reading between the lines you can see the overall effects beginning to become true. The population expansion has not slowed. Predicting when humanity will reach the carrying capacity of Planet Earth is not a simple task. We're over 7 billion now, predicting 10 billion by 2040 maybe sooner and still nobody (of any import) seems to be alarmed.


    26. Interesting discussion of overpopulation, environmental degradation, and possible policy solutions. The book is pretty dated, and it’s not without problematic aspects, but it’s interesting to see the 1960s perspective on the population debate, as well the arguments against pesticides, overconsumption, car culture, air pollution, and poisoning lakes and rivers, from 50 years ago.


    27. One of the most important college books of the late 1960's to early 1970's. this one book changed the way the "World view of the human population bomb of the time.Looking back, it is very interesting that China's population trend's changed greatly after this book was 1st written.An important "Classic" of the time.


    28. I read this book over 40 years ago. It made a strong impression on mebecause it addressed an issue that was new to me at the time: that every physical thing, even the earth itself, has its limits. As the years have gone by, it has become abundantly clear to me that this is true. The earth can only feed and house so many people, and after that, resources become so scarce that many cannot thrive.


    29. Well It's certainly the kind of book I'd be reading back in 1970's time of increasing environmental awareness. My senior paper at CU was on the Club of Rome's "The Limits to Growth". Mr. Ehrlich was on TV a lot in those days. The Tonight Show for instance I don't actually REMEMBER reading it but I probably read at least some of it. Date read is approximate


    Leave a Reply