How to Lose a Battle: Foolish Plans and Great Military Blunders

How to Lose a Battle: Foolish Plans and Great Military Blunders

Bill Fawcett / Dec 15, 2019

How to Lose a Battle Foolish Plans and Great Military Blunders A remarkable compendium of the worst military decisions and the men who made them The annals of history are littered with horribly bad military leaders These combat incompetents found amazing ways to

  • Title: How to Lose a Battle: Foolish Plans and Great Military Blunders
  • Author: Bill Fawcett
  • ISBN: 9780060760243
  • Page: 498
  • Format: Paperback
  • A remarkable compendium of the worst military decisions and the men who made them The annals of history are littered with horribly bad military leaders These combat incompetents found amazing ways to ensure their army s defeat Whether it was a lack of proper planning, miscalculation, ego, bad luck, or just plain stupidity, certain wartime stratagems should never have lA remarkable compendium of the worst military decisions and the men who made them The annals of history are littered with horribly bad military leaders These combat incompetents found amazing ways to ensure their army s defeat Whether it was a lack of proper planning, miscalculation, ego, bad luck, or just plain stupidity, certain wartime stratagems should never have left the drawing board Written with wit, intelligence, and eminent readability, How to Lose a Battle pays dubious homage to these momentous and bloody blunders, including Cannae, 216 B.C the bumbling Romans lose 80,000 troops to Hannibal s forces The Second Crusade an entire Christian army is slaughtered when it stops for a drink of water The Battle of Britain Hitler s dreaded Luftwaffe blows it big time Pearl Harbor than one warning of the impending attack is there, but nobody listens How to Lose a Battle includes than thirty five chapters worth of astonishing and avoidable disasters, both infamous and obscure a treasure trove of trivia, history, and jaw dropping facts about the most costly military missteps ever taken.

    How To Lose Weight Fast and Safely WebMD Watch your drinks One easy way to lose weight quickly is to cut out liquid calories, such as soda, juice, and alcohol Replace them with zero calorie drinks like lemon water, unsweetened tea, or black coffee Diet drinks will save you calories, compared with sugary beverages. How to Lose Weight Fast Simple Steps, Based on Science Ways to Lose Weight Fast Health Ways to Lose Weight Fast Tweak your lifestyle Swap your go to order Skip the salty aisle Have a calorie breakfast Get fit in five Kick the habit Do a purge Healthy up your happy hour Get fired up Pile on the veggies Run your butt off Downward dog it Don t supersize it Lose Definition of Lose by Merriam Webster Lose definition is to bring to destruction used chiefly in passive construction How to use lose in a sentence to bring to destruction used chiefly in passive construction damn to miss from one s possession or from a customary or supposed place See the full definition. Safe and Effective Ways to Lose Weight Fast wikiHow How to Lose Weight EatingWell How to Lose Weight on a Budget Ways to Help Your Diet Become a Way of Life Ways to Follow the Mediterranean Diet for Better Health ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Forget About Calorie Counting Ways to Eat Healthier Instead What Happens to Your Body When You Quit Drinking. How to Lose Belly Fat Fast Ways to Lose Inches in How to lose weight easy steps to lose weight in days

    • Free Read [Memoir Book] ☆ How to Lose a Battle: Foolish Plans and Great Military Blunders - by Bill Fawcett ✓
      498 Bill Fawcett
    • thumbnail Title: Free Read [Memoir Book] ☆ How to Lose a Battle: Foolish Plans and Great Military Blunders - by Bill Fawcett ✓
      Posted by:Bill Fawcett
      Published :2018-011-04T22:48:36+00:00

    About "Bill Fawcett"

      • Bill Fawcett

        Bill Fawcett has been a professor, teacher, corporate executive, and college dean His entire life has been spent in the creative fields and managing other creative individuals He is one of the founders of Mayfair Games, a board and role play gaming company As an author, Fawcett has written or coauthored over a dozen books and dozens of articles and short stories As a book packager, a person who prepares series of books from concept to production for major publishers, his company, Bill Fawcett Associates, has packaged than 250 titles for virtually every major publisher He founded, and later sold, what is now the largest hobby shop in Northern Illinois.Fawcett s first commercial writing appeared as articles in the Dragon magazine and include some of the earliest appearances of classes and monster types for Dungeons Dragons With Mayfair Games he created, wrote, and edited many of the Role Aides role playing game modules and supplements released in the 1970s and 1980s During this period, he also designed almost a dozen board games, including several Charles Roberts Award gaming s Emmy winners, such as Empire Builder and Sanctuary.


    1. A worthwhile read. The author (actually the editor and author of some, but not all, of the content) has done a good job of describing a dismal series of, as the subtitle says, foolish plans and great military blunders. He omitted some I'd have covered, but over the millennia there have just been so many - to even come close to analyzing them all would take an encyclopedia instead of one book. I also appreciated the fact that the authors debunked a number of myths about some of these events. The [...]

    2. Interesting, if depressing, view on major fails of battle. It makes you realize a lot of people in power refuse to listen to anyone below them and often leads to Doom. I enjoyed the WW2 inclusions since I generally don't read as much on that.

    3. While an entertaining read, this book should be seen as no more than an introduction to some of history's worst military blunders. As a collection of short pieces by several different authors, each battle gets its own chapter, and there are a lot of them; 37 different battles and military engagements are tackled in just 316 pages. As with any collection by different writers, the quality of each chapter varies; some chapters give an excellent analysis and description of the situation, the persona [...]

    4. Lightweight but entertaining book - the sheer enjoyment of being able to use 20-20 hindsight to loftily criticise major historical figures is what makes it worth the read.Most of the contributions are written by Fawcett and generally pretty objective, though some of the chapters by other authors are of variable quality, especially the one on the 6-day war which falls woefully short of being an objective analysis.The book is heavily US-oriented in that it includes some very minor US events while [...]

    5. A light analysis of multiple battles from the 4th century BC to 1954 notable for ineptitude of leadership and pointless loss of life. Chapter by chapter it draws an arc of technological advance and cultural change as it hops around the world. Overall it is a very accessible book for the non-expert with the multiple authors clearly setting the stage for each chapter's conflict, but the middle chapters written by William R Forstchen covering the American civil war were pretty well unreadable. They [...]

    6. My expectations of this book were neither high nor low, but in the end I expected it to be a rather quick and amusing read. I got what I wanted in some of the battle descriptions but I was left feeling like some battles deserved more insight.I was not surprised to find that most of these battles were western-centric though I would have liked to know the criteria for choosing a battle to write about. I mean could the Battle of Marathon not also be included?Some battle descriptions seemed to drag [...]

    7. Para un marxista radical, la historia real que vivimos es en sí misma una cierta clase de historia alternativa realizada, es la realidad en la que tenemos que vivir porque en el pasado fracasamos en aprovechar el momento y actuar. Los historiadores de los hechos militares han demostrado que los confederados perdieron la batalla de Gettysburg porque el general Lee cometió una serie de equivocaciones totalmente impropias: «Gettysburg fue la única batalla librada por Lee que parece de ficción. [...]

    8. If you go into this book expecting a detailed accounting of every battle it covers you will be disappointed. If however you understand that it's just over 300 pages and covering over 30 events then you should find yourself as pretty amused. If nothing else you'll walk away with a better idea of how to lose a battle. I've studied history quite a bit and some of these stories were news to me. Bill Fawcett's book should be used as a jumping off point if you want to know more about each individual b [...]

    9. Honestly a modest book, slightly interesting because there is a list of famous battles which are dealt with in a very short way, just no more than 20 ebook pages at most. Every battle from remote antiquity to the more modern battle of the six days war (indeed more a war than a battle).The author is slightly presuming to know a lot about how a battle should be conducete and where the faults were, but foreknowledge is a difficult thing to manage.expecially in hindsight.The book honestly does not a [...]

    10. The biook is easy to pick up and read because the chapters are not inter connected 9except for two on Gettysburg) the Authors present a brief case study of a chosen battle in histroy, gone wrong, and after outlining the general information, course of action, and result, attempt to answer why the batttle went wrong. Some chapters/case studys are 3 pages. Some are 5. Most are less than ten. Therefore the book is a great "primer" and nice to see some battles getting attention that are not so widely [...]

    11. This book was a good change of pace for what I'd been getting engrossed in and therefore a nice light bedtime read. I found it kind of hilarious when it got to the American Civil War, particularly Gettysburg. That was when it became glaringly clear the authors were not only Americans but huge enthusiasts of that particular war. Two chapters for Gettysburg was a bit much, but hilarious none the less to see the passion that went into writing them.

    12. Fawcett is an accomplished military writer. He distills the various battles down to their basic components, while still capturing the chaos and uncertainty that charactierizes warfare. This book made me realize that many pivotal points in history were decided by unforseen details. A general choosing to march his troops too far; a misplaced map; an overconfident officer -- these are the factors that often shape our history.

    13. With the exception of the chapters on the U.S. civil war by William Forstchen, all but one of the remaining chapters provide a very simplistic analysis and will not likely appeal to those with any background in military history or tactics. The one exception is the chapter on the Six Day War which provides absolutely no analysis of the war - it is simply a propaganda piece extolling Israel's struggles against the Arabs. Overall: too simplistic except for chapters by Forstchen on the Civil War.

    14. Some of the essays are really interesting, but there are a few that really don't fit (um, the exodus? honestly?) and made my attention lag. Also it's a shame that the book is so Western/American centric. Though obviously lots of westeners are shown in a bad light, it would have been neat to see some ancient chinese or japanese battles in there too, not just romans and greeks and then onto the british and americans.

    15. A book has to be pretty bad for me to not finish it, but I just couldn't. I only perservered as long as I did (about 3/4 through), because I was travelling and didn't have anything else. The concept is interesting, but is was soooo badly written - I think by a group of amateur history buffs If you like this idea of military mistakes, The Hinge Factor is a much better read.

    16. Pretty good read, especially if you want a book to read in short bursts (like while I'm waiting for the plane to take off so I can fire up my electronic devices). Most of the articles are just overviews (and some might have been a bit of a reach) but I have a few ideas on subjects I might want to dig into a little more.

    17. There is much more potential in this book than is ultimately realized. Occasionally amusing, this reads more as a history text and lacks the excitement promised in the title. However, insightful and exhaustive analyses of some of the more (in)famous fiascos of modern history keep it afloat and enjoyable.

    18. I found this book VERY entertaining, especially the parts about the Civil War. Though this book can be very dreary to some, as it has a play-by-play tactical analysis of the battles, I found it interesting to read and discover how "stupid" some commanders have been in history

    19. at the best a waste of time. only american battles carry some details or the only details. however does increase to the knowledge of wars. just european or american wars. no mention of eastern wars.

    20. Poorly written and confusing in a couple of places, but otherwise an interesting overview of the errors, often the same over thousands of years, that lose you the battle, the war, and even your life.

    21. A good jumping off point for more insight into the various conflicts. Some of the essay's are better than the others, but overall the book is good.

    22. Interesting. Some are blunders, bad luck, arrogance, ineptitude, etc. A decent read and given to you in nice small bite size pieces. I will read another from this author.

    Leave a Reply